One-year slippage in the commissioning of the ASEAN Power Grid will cost the region $2.6 billion, increasing to $14 billion for a five-year delay | Ember

One-year slippage in the commissioning of the ASEAN Power Grid will cost the region $2.6 billion, increasing to $14 billion for a five-year delay

20 Aug 2026

Even a single year of delay reshapes the region’s build-out. Ember’s modelling found that under a cost-optimal scenario with the full implementation of APG by 2035, clean energy is already the most affordable option for ASEAN’s future, accounting for over 90% of the 400 GW of new capacity needed by 2040. However, in our analysis, in the absence of the regional grid by 2035, as much as 7.2 gigawatts (GW) of solar will remain undeveloped. This will result in a 13.6 TWh reduction in solar generation by 2040. To fill in the missing renewable supply, ASEAN will require an additional 50.6 TWh of gas to compensate for the shortfall.

The advancement of regional energy interconnectivity across Asia and the Pacific is becoming increasingly urgent for three reasons: strengthening energy security, meeting rapidly growing electricity demand driven by artificial intelligence and digitalisation, and addressing the long-term challenge of climate change. Interconnected electricity networks enable clean power to flow across borders as seamlessly as trade and information, enhancing energy security, accelerating decarbonization, and creating shared economic prosperity. In this context, the ASEAN Power Grid represents a critical milestone and an important stepping stone toward the successful realisation of ADB’s Pan-Asian Power Grid Initiative.

Dr Priyantha Wijayatunga
‍
Deputy Director General, Sectors Department 1, Asian Development Bank (ADB)

Singapore, which assumes the ASEAN chairmanship from 1 January 2027, has the most at stake. As a land-constrained nation, Singapore can only build around 6.6 GW of domestic solar capacity. Ember’s analysis shows that if the grid arrives on schedule, interconnectors can meet around 49% of Singapore’s electricity demand in 2035. If it slips by just one year, that figure drops to 2.5%; gas still supplies over 86% of generation, and 300 MW of new gas capacity gets built to cover the gap. This capacity runs for 20 to 30 years, well past the point at which the cables arrive.

Renewable energy-rich nations will also lose the opportunity to earn from electricity exports. Findings from the modelling show that Indonesia’s Sumatra, Lao PDR, Cambodia and Myanmar together forgo over $1.1 billion in export revenue for every year of delay, with Sumatra alone losing nearly $400 million. This missed opportunity income cannot be reversed. As demand centres cannot wait, countries are forced to lock into fossil fuel capacity.

The ASEAN Power Grid is more than an energy project, it is a strategic investment in regional resilience, strengthening partnerships and deepening economic integration through cross-border electricity trade. Political consensus is getting stronger and capital is increasingly available. What remains is timely execution. Every year of delay carries real economic and energy security costs.

Lam Pham
‍
Energy analyst, Ember

The report finds the binding constraint is governance. The International Energy Agency puts the cost of APG interconnections at around $27 billion by 2040, rising to $100 billion by 2045 once domestic grid upgrades are included, according to the Asian Development Bank — a sum the report says is manageable if capital is effectively mobilised from multilateral banks and private investors. However, multiple ASEAN bodies coordinate planning, but none can enforce decisions. National rules add to the problem. Indonesia does not permit third-party access to transmission infrastructure and requires renewals of renewable electricity export permits every five years, while investors need 20 to 25 years of certainty to finance large-scale renewable energy and interconnection projects.

Ember recommends three shifts happening together to ensure the APG is built by 2035. Political commitment must hold beyond electoral cycles, backed by the active working-level coordination like those that delivered the Lao PDR–Thailand–Malaysia–Singapore Power Integration Project. Wheeling charges, transmission tariffs and cost allocation need harmonising on a beneficiary-pays basis so projects become bankable. Bilateral deals remain the pragmatic starting point, but their governance should be designed from the outset to scale into multilateral power trade, which can lift interconnector utilisation from around 60% to as high as 90%.

Cross-border power trade will not be unlocked by ambition alone. For the ASEAN Power Grid to move from political consensus to bankable projects, investors need confidence that costs, tariffs and risks are allocated transparently and consistently across borders. Harmonised tariff frameworks are therefore not just a technical requirement, but a strategic foundation for mobilising capital, strengthening regional energy security and turning ASEAN’s clean power potential into shared economic value.

Dr Victor Nian
‍
Founding co-chairman of the Centre for Strategic Energy and Resources

About Ember

Ember is an independent energy think tank that aims to accelerate the clean energy transition with data and policy. It creates targeted data insights to advance policies that urgently shift the world to a clean, electrified energy future.

Learn more
Share