Adding coal beyond the National Electricity Plan 2032 targets is uneconomical for India | Ember

Adding coal beyond the National Electricity Plan 2032 targets is uneconomical for India

More solar entering the generation mix is likely to push down the coal fleet’s utilisation, demand a higher level of flexibility in generation and consequently increase its tariff, making firm and dispatchable renewable energy increasingly more attractive for delivering reliable power

29 Oct 2025

Firm and dispatchable renewable energy (FDRE) options — renewable energy coupled with battery storage — are becoming increasingly competitive, with tariffs between INR 4.3–5.8/kilowatt-hour (kWh) (USD 49-67/MWh) and a proven ability to meet availability and performance obligations. As a result, India can achieve reliability and flexibility without resorting to new coal builds.

This has been driven partly by the success of large-scale auctions, falling prices and improvements in battery technology.

Highlighting the fast-changing dynamics of grid-scale batteries and their importance to India’s future electricity system, being self-reliant and resilient, Ember’s Chief Analyst, Dave Jones, says that their lifetime runs into decades and the latest sodium-ion batteries use zero critical minerals.

Already, India’s auctions are incorporating more hours of battery, and ultimately, batteries will work with solar to make 24/365 electricity. There’s no reason why India can’t copy its success from solar manufacturing to become self-sufficient in battery manufacturing, and so energising India with home-grown solar and battery,

Dave Jones
Chief Analyst, Ember

Having learned from past coal overbuild, India must avoid repeating old mistakes amid a rapidly changing energy landscape. Renewables with storage now clearly stand out as the more prudent investment choice.

Duttatreya Das
Asia Energy Analyst, Ember

Already, coal-based electricity has become prohibitively expensive, with recently discovered tariffs above INR 6/kWh (USD 68/MWh) in Bihar and around INR 5.85/kWh (USD 66/MWh) in Madhya Pradesh, despite both states being located close to coal-producing regions. Much of this escalation is driven by very high fixed costs, often exceeding INR 4/kWh (USD 45/MWh). 

Lower PLFs in FY 2031-32 can send such tariffs soaring. For example, a cost of INR 6/kWh (USD 69/MWh) can effectively rise to INR 7.25/kWh (USD 83/MWh) for an electricity distribution company (DISCOM) when adjusted for the utilisation levels reflected in Ember’s model. The higher fixed costs further exacerbate the challenge, leading to stranded power assets that are seldom dispatched yet continue to incur servicing obligations.

The report recommends prioritising acceleration of storage deployment, retrofitting select thermal plants for deeper flexibility, and strengthening dispatch and reserve frameworks to support renewable integration at least cost.

The report finds that utilisation rates or plant load factors (PLFs) of Indian coal plants will fall to 55% in FY 2031-32 from 69% in FY 2024-25, as coal shifts from being a baseload provider to a flexible balancing resource. Further, the coal fleet will be required to routinely swing by 70–80 gigawatts (GW) between morning and mid-day, operating only slightly above its technical minimum. Lower PLFs and higher flexing requirements will increase both the per unit capacity-carrying (fixed) and operating costs for coal under power purchase agreements (PPAs).

About Ember

Ember is an independent energy think tank that aims to accelerate the clean energy transition with data and policy. It creates targeted data insights to advance policies that urgently shift the world to a clean, electrified energy future.

Learn more
Share